• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Debbie Hines, Trial Attorney, Former Prosecutor, Speaker and Legal Analyst

  • Home
  • Attorney Profile
  • Practice Areas
  • Media
  • Blog
  • Contact

Will Obama’s Judicial Nominees be Denied or Delayed Justice?

By debbie on August 14, 2011

Photo by Samantha Appleton
White House Photo by Samantha Appleton

This past week marked the anniversaries of  Supreme Court Justices  Sonia Sotomayer and Elena Kagan while in contrast, many pending federal  judicial nominees,  who are women,  minorities and a cross section of the population, have been left hanging in limbo land.   President Obama has had many more diverse nominees than any of our former presidents.  In fact, some say it has been “strikingly so.”   More than 50% of the Obama administration judicial nominees are women, 21% are African American, 11% are Hispanic,  7% are Asian American, one is Native American   and three pending nominees are openly gay.  Kathryn Ruemmler, the White House counsel, stated, “The president wants the federal courts to look like America. He wants people who are coming to court to feel like it’s their court as well.”

Yet, it may all be for naught since many cannot make it through the process to receive a confirmation hearing. Even for those who are fortunate enough to make it to the committee, many  still await final votes.

A total of 56 federal judge nominees have been left awaiting confirmation while the GOP controlled Congress left for a month long vacation.  President Obama made two new judicial nominations in August.  U.S. District Court Judge Adalberto José Jordán was nominated to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit while litigator Miranda Du was nominated to the U.S. District Court for the District of Nevada.  Twenty judicial nominations were left lagging awaiting final votes after making it to the Senate Judicial Committee.

It seems that never before in the history of the judicial nominating process has there been such an extreme back log and delay of hearings and votes on judicial nominees.   According to the Alliance for Justice, committee Republicans have held over votes on every one of President Obama’s judicial nominees, regardless of qualification, in an effort to delay filling vacant judgeships. By comparison to former Presidents George Bush and Bill Clinton at the comparable time period, President Clinton had 84% of his nominees confirmed; President Bush had 73% while President Obama has had only 61% of his judicial nominees confirmed.

So what does this all matter to the average American?  It further shows our three branches of government are hardly working in tandem. The president is nominating persons to the federal bench. Our legislative branch is stalling on appointments, like a car stuck in neutral. And the judiciary branch is caught between a rock and a hard place with overworked   and burdensome dockets.  And if you are a federal litigant, it means justice is further delayed on your case due to the backlog.  But for many pending judicial nominees, it means justice for them is unfairly delayed, as they await their “day in court” for a senate confirmation hearing. They deserve no more than a prompt hearing and an up or down vote. We should demand no less from the Senate  than to give them their over due process.  The unprecedented delay benefits no one who cares for justice.

Debbie Hines is a lawyer who has litigated cases in various federal courts across the country. She is a legal commentator who has appeared on TV and radio on issues affecting women and minorities.  She also contributes to the Huffington Post and Politic 365.

Share this:

  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Tumblr (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Reddit (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Pinterest (Opens in new window)

Reader Interactions

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Primary Sidebar

Subscribe to Blog

Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Recent Posts

  • Rodney Reed and Why We Must End the Death Penalty
  • Lori Loughlin Didn’t Get the Memo
  • Why Amber Guyger’s Appeal Success is Unlikely
  • Florida Judge Temporarily Halts Voter Disenfranchisement Law
  • Mitch McConnell’s Chickens may be Soon Coming Home to Roost

Debbie Hines, Former Prosecutor and Trial Attorney

Practice Areas:
➾ Criminal and Civil Litigation
➾ Criminal
➾ Personal Injury
➾ Family Law
➾ Administrative Law

Follow us on Social Media
iamdebbiehines iamdebbiehines iamdebbiehines iamdebbiehines

Practice Locations:
We service clients in primary locations including the District of Columbia and most counties in Maryland including Prince George’s, Montgomery, Anne Arundel, Baltimore City, Baltimore County, Howard, Dorchester, Somerset, Talbot and Wicomico.

Disclaimer: Any information on this site does not constitute legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is established with the use of this site.

2019 © Law Offices of Deborah Hines (“Debbie Hines”) | 2101 L Street, N.W. Suite 800, Washington, D.C. 20037

LegalSpeaks™ | Privacy Policy | Sitemap

Website Design by: VanStudios