• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Debbie Hines, Trial Attorney, Former Prosecutor, Speaker and Legal Analyst

  • Home
  • Attorney Profile
  • Practice Areas
  • Media
  • Blog
  • Contact

Roger Stone’s Fate at a Trial Will be Decided by Blacks

By debbie on January 29, 2019

Roger Stone was arraigned in D.C. federal court today. As expected, Stone entered a plea of not guilty. An arraignment hearing is for the purpose of advising the defendant of the present charges against him, allow him to enter a plea of guilty or not guilty plus state additional terms of the defendant’s pre-trial release. Stone had to give up his passport and cannot contact any witnesses. If he violates the terms, he goes to jail pending his trial date.

As for Stone, he is slowly learning what it means to be a defendant. Stone voiced concerns about being arrested in the early morning hours with over 20 FBI agents. His specific concern was that he was arrested with more force than Osama Bin Laden. By the way, Osama Bin Laden was shot to death during the raid on his house. The courtesy of affording a white -collar defendant the ability to turn himself in with his attorney at his convenience is exactly that… a courtesy. It is not mandatory, as Stone discovered.

Now the real reason why the arrest was likely done in the manner it was conducted had to do with the parallel search warrant of Stone’s residences. An announcement in advance would have potentially allowed Stone to destroy or attempt to destroy documents. A search warrant is obtained with a judge signing off on it. In the affidavit that is presented to a judge to obtain a search warrant is the belief of what the search is more than likely to yield. The Mueller prosecutors had good reason to believe based on either cooperating testimony or either evidence that another crime or crimes may have been committed.

It is likely that more charges are being considered. Stone may be asserting his white privilege in public. However, as a charged defendant, he is no different than other defendants who go before the court. He will be processed in the same way as all others.

As the events unfold and Stone’s attorneys learn of the evidence against their client, Roger Stone may be less inclined to boldly assert the lack of evidence against him. As the indictment reads, the prosecution has what appears to be a tight case against Stone. The reality of possible jail time may soon become a wake-up call for Stone. It’s usually a matter of if you feel lucky and want to roll the dice. Of if you want to face reality that wearing an orange jumpsuit daily is staring you in the face. Reality comes in many forms.

Stone emphatically states his wants his day in court. In a jury trial in the District of Columbia, Stone will be facing jurors who reside in D.C. Most D.C. voters voted overwhelmingly Democrat by almost 91% in the November 2016 presidential election. Only 4% of all D.C. residents voted for Donald Trump. While the District of Columbia’s Black population is just slightly under 50%, those jurors are not likely to be sympathetic to Stone. The fact that many potential jurors in D.C. work for the federal government which was closed for 35 days due to Trump’s shutdown bears indirectly on how jurors might feel about Stone. Stone has made it clear of his close association to Donald Trump. While jurors are advised to base their verdict solely on the evidence presented in a case, no one juror is  likely to be able to completely forego their thoughts about Trump.

Another hearing is scheduled for Friday, February 1 to plan future court events and hearings. Stone left the D.C. federal court without as much of a whimper, unlike his blustering and bold statements following his arrest in Florida. Maybe Stone is giving thought to those potential D.C. jurors who might hear his case and judge his guilt or innocence.

Washington, DC based Debbie Hines is an attorney and former prosecutor.

Share this:

  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Tumblr (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Reddit (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Pinterest (Opens in new window)

Reader Interactions

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Primary Sidebar

Subscribe to Blog

Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Recent Posts

  • Derek Chauvin Trial Recap – Part I
  • Virginia Ends Death Penalty After 400 Years
  • Derek Chauvin Defense versus Justice for George Floyd
  • Justice for George Floyd versus Black Reality
  • We Must Take Action in Jails to Prevent Spread of Covid-19

Debbie Hines, Former Prosecutor and Trial Attorney

Practice Areas:
➾ Criminal and Civil Litigation
➾ Criminal
➾ Personal Injury
➾ Family Law
➾ Administrative Law

Follow us on Social Media
iamdebbiehines iamdebbiehines iamdebbiehines iamdebbiehines

Practice Locations:
We service clients in primary locations including the District of Columbia and most counties in Maryland including Prince George’s, Montgomery, Anne Arundel, Baltimore City, Baltimore County, Howard, Dorchester, Somerset, Talbot and Wicomico.

Disclaimer: Any information on this site does not constitute legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is established with the use of this site.

2022 © Law Offices of Deborah Hines (“Debbie Hines”) | 2101 L Street, N.W. Suite 800, Washington, D.C. 20037

LegalSpeaks™ | Privacy Policy | Sitemap

Website Design by: VanStudios